It is because 1) in humans, visual thinking and language-based thinking are separate (albeit linked) processes, and 2) a mediocre command line interface is much worse than a mediocre GUI.
A command line interface delivers no useful cues to the visual thinking brain areas, rendering half of our usual orientation ability useless. It works with language only. And that language is very weird when compared to normal human languages. It requires high precision, unlike the language communication we are hardwired for. And both the actions of the classic console (giving no useful cues what you are expected to do) and the reactions of the classic console (spitting out a cryptic message, doing nothing or doing the wrong thing when you do something wrong) are not very helpful for a typical human learning process.
So, humans starting to work with a console soon feel frustrated. Command line tools only remain popular with the people who 1) have a very high preference for the verbal channel and its focus on abstract thought and 2) are very good at the specific style of learning known as RTFM (which is the same style needed for learning abstract concepts such as maths, and mostly useless for physical skills such as playing soccer). The preference for this learning style has always been rare.
Note that when there is no need for the user to learn the correct language before they start experiencing some kind of success, the CLI is accepted by everybody. Google search is basically a CLI - but it is gentle. It never says "bad command or file name", and always delivers some results, even if they are worse than what you expected.
Beyond the learnability issue, the CLI is not generally worse than the GUI. The GUI is better for situations where spatial relationships in the information are important (e.g. photo manipulation), and the CLI is better for situation where conditional, temporal, causal and other abstract/logical relationships are important. There is a reason why all programming languages in wide use are word-based, despite lots of effort to develop graphic representations in the form of flow charts and the whole family of UML diagrams and then some more. It is just that this kind of information can be processed through verbal thinking much more successfully than through visual thinking.
But most applications are not extremely focused on manipulating either spatial or abstract relationships, and so we use interfaces which combine visual clues with words, like the traditional GUI which has labelled buttons.
answered Feb 18 '14 at 16:42
6,06322 gold badges1616 silver badges3030 bronze badges
- Which is the happiest pet animal
- What is air temperature in space
- Is Mendini a good brand for flutes
- Do you use baby powder
- What is the application software?no_redirect=1
- What is your unforgettable hotel experience
- Why do we still call albums CDS
- Are boost mobile phones unlocked?no_redirect=1
- How does Russia see Belarus
- Are Canadians actually perfect
- Does drinking smart water make you smart
- What are Oppai mouse pads
- What are the sources of natural fibres
- Does Google really matter in our life
- How technical is Barack Obama
- Is getsshows com legit
- What do you think about vegan cosmetics
- Who are the worlds leading kakapo veterinarians
- How can I advertise my tuition centre
- Do hackers ever feel powerful