HARARE (AFP) - Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe defied expectations by not resigning on Sunday (Nov 20), but support for the 93-year-old veteran leader is still crumbling.
The ruling party ZANU-PF has sacked him and mass demonstrations on Saturday called for him to step down after the army seized power earlier in the week.
Here are some of the possible routes by which Mr Mugabe could leave power:
Article 96 of Zimbabwe's constitution says that the president can resign if they submit a letter to the parliament speaker who must publicly announce it within 24 hours.
Resignation would be the fastest, simplest and least risky way for Mr Mugabe to leave power - but on Sunday he again showed that he intends to resist all calls to step down.
During his first meeting on Thursday with the army general who led the military takeover, he bluntly refused to step aside.
Another sticking point for this formula is political. The constitution says that in the event of a presidential resignation, he will be replaced by the vice president.
But the military's preferred candidate to succeed Mr Mugabe, Emmerson Mnangagwa, was removed as vice president last week.
There is however a second vice president - Phelekeza Mphoko - who was loyal to First Lady Grace Mugabe and would be elevated to president - something the army would want to avoid.
The army would first have to persuade Mr Mugabe to reappoint Mr Mnangagwa.
The National Assembly and the Senate can start proceedings to remove the president if both pass simple majority votes against the head of state in cases of "serious misconduct", "failure to obey, uphold or defend (the) constitution", "violation" of the constitution or "incapacity".
Once the votes are passed, the two chambers must then appoint a joint committee to investigate removing the president.
If the commission recommends impeachment, the president can be removed from office once both houses back it with two-thirds majorities, according to section 97 of Zimbabwe's constitution.
The vast majority of elected ZANU-PF representatives, like the opposition, are now in favour of removing Mugabe - but the process could be slow.
And like the resignation route, it would currently result in Mr Mphoko becoming head of state.
Forcing him out
The military seized power late on Tuesday night but have been at pains to give the impression of obeying the law and have sought to play down suggestions that their intervention amounted to a coup.
"We wish to make it abundantly clear that this is not a military takeover... We are only targeting criminals around him (Mugabe)," said Major General Sibusiso Moyo as he read a statement justifying the army's actions on state TV in the early hours of Wednesday.
The African Union and the Southern African Development Community regional bloc have warned the army not to try to remove Mr Mugabe by illegal means.
The generals appear to have heeded their warnings and have instead pushed for dialogue with Mr Mugabe, appearing alongside him at Sunday's TV address.
- What matches with a yellow hoodie
- Where is it better to study ACCA
- Who is Angela Merkel beyond politics
- Which Bollywood actress has the biggest boobs?no_redirect=1
- What is a publisher
- What is Nicotex
- Why is a rats life so short
- Is zombie better than the walking dead
- Are startup costs fixed assets
- How can I make soft spaghetti squash
- What kind of handbag should I buy
- How can we get UK admission
- How do I get paid by drawing
- What is dynamic creative optimization
- How do entrepreneurs pay themselves
- What is your best Photoshop retouching picture
- How was graphite discovered
- Are BJP leaders showing double standards
- What is ITIL and its significance
- Does BTS still read fan letters